Preparation Resources · 2026 Essay Competition

Everything you need to write the essay

Free preparation resources for the 2026 LSESU Economics Society Essay Competition — a 5-question strategy guide, a curated reading list of academic sources, a Harvard referencing primer, and a 10-week writing timeline. All free, all openly available — there is no registration for the competition, and nothing to unlock to read the guidance below.

5
Question strategies
10
Week timeline
Harvard
Referencing
£0
For everything
free
What is in the free pack
  • ·5-question strategy guide — framing notes for each prompt-setter
  • ·Curated reading list — academic sources per question
  • ·Harvard referencing primer — citation style + examples
  • ·10-week writing timeline — drafting cadence to the deadline
01 · The free preparation pack

Four documents, one bundle

All four documents below are free and openly available — there is nothing to register for and no account to create. Message the Society on WhatsApp and we will send the full pack as a single PDF bundle within one working day; the summaries on this page give the public-facing version, with a more detailed copy available on request.

Document 01

Question strategy guide

For each of the five 2026 prompts: how the prompt-setter is likely to read it, the most common framing trap, the strongest counter-argument candidates should pre-empt, and three classes of evidence that work well on the rubric.

Document 02

Recommended-reading list

An annotated list of academic papers, policy reports, and recent book chapters that bear directly on each 2026 prompt. Curated by the editorial committee; weighted toward open-access and library-accessible sources.

Document 03

Harvard referencing primer

A short, applied tutorial on Harvard style — in-text citation, reference list ordering, how to cite journals vs working papers vs central-bank speeches. Includes a one-page reference template you can copy into your draft.

Document 04

10-week writing timeline

A week-by-week plan from “first read of the prompt” through “submit by 1 September”. Includes recommended milestones for first draft, peer-read, redraft, and the final 48-hour formatting check against the published specification.

02 · How to approach each prompt

Five strategy notes, one per question

Pick the question whose framing you can defend with the most original evidence, not the question that looks most prestigious. A tight argument on a less-glamorous prompt beats a vague survey of a Nobel-laureate one — the rubric rewards specificity over coverage.

QUESTION 01

Remote work & monitoring

Treat this as a principal-agent problem with a productivity-signal trade-off. The strongest essays cite empirical evidence on monitoring’s effects on intrinsic motivation, not just survey data on worker preferences. Bloom’s work on remote productivity (2015 onward) and recent Microsoft Workplace Insights studies are common citation anchors.

QUESTION 02

Bank of England energy brief

Write to the format — a policy brief is concise, technically literate, and ends with a decision recommendation. Distinguish first-round (supply-shock) and second-round (wage-price spiral) inflation effects. Strong essays cite recent Monetary Policy Committee minutes and Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin papers, not just textbook AS-AD.

QUESTION 03

AI & labour inequality

Distinguish task-level automation from job-level displacement (Autor’s framework). Discuss policy levers explicitly — reskilling, UBI, working-time reduction, sectoral redistribution — and weigh them on incentive and feasibility grounds. Citing recent IMF or OECD reports on AI labour-market effects is more current than 2010s automation literature.

QUESTION 04

Taxing the top 1%

Separate the “possible” question (elasticity of high-income earnings, Laffer-curve calibration, capital mobility) from the “desirable” question (distributive justice, productive incentives, political economy). Citing Saez-Piketty-Zucman or Diamond-Saez frameworks signals literature awareness; mentioning the UK non-dom debate gives recency.

QUESTION 05

Green tech & wealth

Distinguish within-country distributional effects (skill premium for green workers, energy-cost regressivity) from between-country effects (lithium supply chains, carbon border adjustment). Strong essays go beyond “climate is bad” framing to discuss who benefits and loses from each specific green-tech transition pathway.

03 · Where to find evidence

Five source categories that score well

The rubric awards 10 points for “Citation & sources” — high-quality sources cited consistently in Harvard style. Below are the categories the editorial committee considers high-quality, ordered by the depth they signal.

Peer-reviewed journal articles

American Economic Review, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Journal of Economic Perspectives. JEP is particularly useful — its survey articles are written for non-specialist economists and are well within reach of a strong A-level student.

Working papers · NBER, CEPR, LSE

Pre-publication working papers from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), and the LSE Department of Economics. Often free to download and more current than published journal articles.

Policy reports · IMF, OECD, BIS

IMF World Economic Outlook, OECD Economic Outlook, Bank for International Settlements quarterly reviews. These give global comparative data and policy commentary; useful for Questions 2, 3, and 5 in particular.

Central-bank publications

Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Federal Reserve FEDS Notes, ECB Working Papers. Essential for Question 2; useful colour for any inflation- or interest-rate-related argument in the other prompts.

Long-form commentary · VoxEU, Project Syndicate, The Economist

VoxEU.org publishes short policy-relevant columns by working economists — excellent for finding a contemporary angle on any of the five 2026 prompts. The Economist is acceptable as commentary but not as a primary academic source. Project Syndicate gives you Nobel-laureate commentary at near-textbook accessibility.

04 · Harvard referencing in two minutes

In-text and reference list templates

In-text citation · author-date

Cite the author surname and year in parentheses where the claim appears: (Smith, 2024). For a direct quotation, add a page number: (Smith, 2024, p. 47). For two authors, use both surnames: (Smith and Patel, 2024). For three or more, use the first author plus “et al.”: (Smith et al., 2024).

Reference list · alphabetical by author surname

Journal article: Smith, J. (2024) ‘Title of article in sentence case’, Journal Name in Italic Title Case, 42(3), pp. 100–125.

Working paper: Smith, J. (2024) Title of working paper. NBER Working Paper 12345. Available at: https://nber.org/papers/w12345 (Accessed: 15 July 2026).

Book: Smith, J. (2024) Title of Book in Italic Title Case. 2nd edn. London: Publisher Name.

Central-bank publication: Bank of England (2024) Title of Bulletin Article. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin Q3. Available at: bankofengland.co.uk (Accessed: 15 July 2026).

Style consistency matters more than which system. The published guidance recommends Harvard, but APA or Chicago are accepted if the candidate uses them consistently throughout. What loses marks is mixing systems — a few APA in-text citations in an otherwise Harvard essay reads as carelessness on a 10-point rubric criterion.

05 · Suggested 10-week timeline

From first read to submitted essay

Week 01Read all five prompts. Pick a shortlist of two prompts you might write on, based on which you already have evidence for. Read the 100-point rubric carefully.
Week 02Build a reading list for each shortlisted prompt — three to five papers per prompt. Skim each to confirm relevance; do not deep-read yet.
Week 03Commit to one prompt. Deep-read the four-to-five-paper shortlist for that prompt; take notes on the central argument, evidence cited, and any counter-arguments you find.
Week 04Draft a one-page outline: thesis statement, three to four argument-supporting paragraphs, one counter-argument paragraph, conclusion. Stress-test the thesis against the strongest counter you can think of.
Weeks 05–06First draft. Write to roughly 1700–1800 words first — you will compress later. Insert in-text citations as you go; you cannot reconstruct them at the end.
Week 07Peer-read by a teacher, an academic mentor, or a strong peer. Ask them to comment specifically against the six rubric criteria. Do not ask them to rewrite — only to critique.
Weeks 08–09Second draft. Compress to 1500 words. Strengthen the weakest rubric criterion identified in the peer-read. Tighten the counter-argument paragraph in particular; it is often where Top 3 essays separate from the rest.
Week 10Final formatting check against the published specification: Times New Roman 12pt, 1.5 spacing, page numbers, Harvard references in a separate list, filename in NAME+QUESTION X format. Submit by 1 September 2026.
06 · Preparation FAQ

Four prep questions

For paper format and the rubric see rules; for the master FAQ see faq.

I haven’t read any academic economics paper before. Where do I start?
Start with the Journal of Economic Perspectives. JEP is written for non-specialist economists, so the prose is accessible to a strong A-level student, and the survey articles cover most of the territory the 2026 prompts touch. Read one JEP article per week for the first three weeks; you will have a much sharper sense of how academic economics actually argues a point.
How many sources should a 1500-word essay cite?
Typically six to ten in the reference list. Fewer than five suggests thin reading; more than fifteen suggests citation-spamming. The judges look at whether sources are cited to make a specific point, not at the length of the reference list. A well-placed citation to a recent NBER working paper carries more weight than a textbook citation.
Can I use ChatGPT or Claude to help me write?
No, for substantive content. The rule “no AI-generated content” is enforced by automatic detection at submission. You may use AI tools as a spellchecker or to debug a single sentence; you may not use them to draft arguments, write paragraphs, or summarise academic papers you have not actually read. Detection accuracy is high enough that the safest rule is to write your own words throughout.
Should I take a paid coaching programme as well?
Optional. Many High Distinction essays are written with only the free pack and the candidate’s own self-study. Structured coaching is more often useful for candidates who want a critical reader for their draft against the rubric, accountability around weekly milestones, or guidance picking the right prompt.
07 · Get the free pack

Scan to receive the free preparation pack

Scan our WhatsApp QR and ask for the free preparation pack. Within one working day you receive the four documents above as a single PDF bundle. There is no registration — when your essay is ready, message us again on WhatsApp and we will send you the submission link. The competition is free and open to everyone.

WhatsApp QR for LSESU Economics Essay Competition free preparation pack
WhatsApp
WeChat QR for LSESU Economics Essay Competition China students
微信 WeChat
Scan for free prep pack